hudson == teh awesome

Hudson is great. Lightyears beyond CruiseControl. Everything configurable through the (awesome) UI, a ecosystem of plugins, and incredibly simple installation.

We don't have that complex a build, but our SCM team looks at me like I'm a crazy person when I point out yet another issue with the build. After the umpteenth time I've found yet another build problem, I decided to give Hudson a try. We need to checkout some modules from the trunk, and others from a branch. It was bad enough when their chosen solution to that problem meant we couldn't automatically trigger the builds with a check-in -- builds had to be forced from the UI, then a pre-build step did a CVS checkout of the modules from the appropriate branches. The last straw was realizing that the pre-build script also contained some logic that overwrote any changes we made to our build.xml file with some out-of-synch version of build.xml that one of them had created at some point in the past. The sort of thing you'd like a heads up about.

With Hudson, builds have been a snap to set up -- monitor these CVS modules, run this script from the repository if any changes are checked-in, the build artifacts will match this regex pattern allow download of them from the UI, keep only X number of builds on the CI server.

Hudson doesn't let you checkout from a mixture of HEAD/branch either -- but it's simple enough to set up multiple build commands, the first of which is doing the branch checkout. We won't get a complete changelog or CI automation, but it's good enough.

disturbing. hilarious.